JBoss Cache 'NonManagedConnectionFactory.java' Local Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Pligg CMS 'status' Parameter SQL Injection Vulnerability

PHP CVE-2012-0057 Security Bypass Vulnerability

[ MDVSA-2012:013 ] mozilla

ESA-2012-010: EMC Documentum xPlore information disclosure vulnerability

RFC 6528 on Defending against Sequence Number Attacks

[SECURITY] [DSA 2403-1] php5 security update

Time to Squish SQL Injection

Lazy Workers May Be Deemed Hackers

>> Advertisement <<
Can you answer the ERP quiz?
These 10 questions determine if your Enterprise RP rollout gets an A+.
http://www.findtechinfo.com/as/acs?pl=781&ca=909

The Scale of Security

Hacker-Tool Law Still Does Little

WiMax: Just Another Security Challenge?

Enterprise Intrusion Analysis, Part One

Responding to a Brute Force SSH Attack

Data Recovery on Linux and <i>ext3</i>

>> Advertisement <<
Can you answer the ERP quiz?
These 10 questions determine if your Enterprise RP rollout gets an A+.
http://www.findtechinfo.com/as/acs?pl=781&ca=909

News, Infocus, Columns, Vulnerabilities, Bugtraq ...

News, Infocus, Columns, Vulnerabilities, Bugtraq ...

ananyo writes "One in five academics in a variety of social science and business fields say they have been asked to pad their papers with superfluous references in order to get published. The figures, from a survey published in the journal Science (abstract), also suggest that journal editors strategically target junior faculty, who in turn were more willing to acquiesce. The controversial practice is not new: those studying publication ethics have for many years noted that some editors encourage extra references in order to boost a journal's impact factor (a measure of the average number of citations an article in the journal receives over two years). But the survey is the first to try to quantify what it calls 'coercive citation,' and shows that this is 'uncomfortably common.' Perhaps the most striking finding of the survey was that although 86% of the respondents said that coercion was inappropriate, and 81% thought it damaged a journal's prestige, 57% said they would add superfluous citations to a paper before submitting it to a journal known to coerce. However, figures from Thomson Reuters suggest that social-science journals tend to have more self-citations than basic-science journals."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

__roo writes "The Wall Street Journal reports that an increasing number of companies are replacing traditional meetings with daily stand-ups. The article points out that stand-up meetings date back to at least World War I, and that in some place, late employees 'sometimes must sing a song like "I'm a Little Teapot," do a lap around the office building or pay a small fine.' Do Slashdot readers feel that stand-up meetings are useful? Do they make a difference? Are they a gimmick?"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

A través de este blog llego a una tremenda reflexión de Marshall Kirkpatrick, co-editor del blog de tecnología de ReadWriteWeb, y probablemente una de las dos personas en el mundo que cree más que yo en el uso de RSS. My take on it is this, and I'll try to say this without getting too upset about it: the lack of uptake of RSS reading software by consumers and businesses is among the turns of events in recent technology history that's most disparaging of the state of humanity. That a personalized, centralized repository for updates from dynamic streams of information delivered by free trusted sources of democratic publishing all over the world has had its tech-lunch eaten by mind-rotting casual Flash games on Facebook is as depressing as the way that public education dreams were dashed when the promise of television became its reality. It's like the psychedelic dreams of Harvard's Dr. Timothy Leary becoming the wretched, heartbreaking narcotic drama of the TV show The Wire. It's terrible. It's reason to pack it all up and go home.